|
|
Post by Louise Karczmarz on Sept 16, 2004 8:28:43 GMT -5
BTW This board is open to guests, so whether or not you are logged in you may vote. Please do not vote for more than one format or more than one time. We would like these results to be representative of people's views.
|
|
|
|
Post by styrland on Sept 16, 2004 16:11:13 GMT -5
I voted hard back. The reason being, I prefer to have the book in front of me where I can happily flick through looking for the relevant pages etc.. Trying to find the right thing on the computer is to time consuming and brain addling.
I also prefer hard back cause the book doesnt fall apart like paperbacks tend to! (Except Louises that are in perfect condition d**n her and her looking after her stuff!!)
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkL on Sept 17, 2004 10:22:06 GMT -5
I straight up hate reading pdf.. i'm getting use to it.. but i'd rather have the book infront of me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Louise Karczmarz on Sept 17, 2004 12:27:43 GMT -5
hardback or softback mark?
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkL on Sept 17, 2004 12:36:23 GMT -5
hardback.. cause i feel softcover is a sort of cheep way out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Louise Karczmarz on Sept 17, 2004 13:12:20 GMT -5
Of course.... but if a book is in softcover it can be sold less expensively to the consumer.... that's a good thing no?
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkL on Sept 17, 2004 14:03:56 GMT -5
it is and its not... sometimes its better to go the extra bit so the "feel" is there.. its a marketing thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by styrland on Sept 17, 2004 14:10:44 GMT -5
Hardbacks are the better option, cause htey be more expensive but they generally last longer and are versitile (you can lean on them and roll dice on the back of them, which is harder with a softback book) And there just generally better.
|
|
|
|
Post by MarkL on Sept 17, 2004 15:39:37 GMT -5
hard backs are just more versatile.
|
|
